In a recent development, prominent human rights activist Aisha Yesufu has strongly criticized political office holders who believed they could manipulate the judiciary through their wealth and influence. Yesufu’s remarks come as she shed light on the political apathy displayed by Nigerian citizens, which she believes has provided an opportunity for politicians to engage in criminal activities.
The statement from Aisha Yesufu appears to be a direct response to a particular section of President Bola Tinubu’s “Democracy Day” address to the nation. During his speech, Tinubu emphasized the importance of putting an end to the use of illegal orders that have been used in the past to undermine or restrict democracy.
However, via her verified Twitter account on Monday, Yesufu challenged Tinubu’s statement, asserting that the current situation has undergone a significant transformation due to increased citizen participation in politics. She expressed her concerns, stating, “They think they own the judiciary just as they once thought they owned the electoral process.”
Yesufu further elaborated on the consequences of political apathy among Nigerian citizens, stating, “Lack of participation by citizens is what allowed them to have the chance to indulge in all manner of criminality. This time, citizens are participating.”
These statements by Aisha Yesufu shed light on the alarming issue of politicians attempting to exert influence over the judiciary through their affluence. Yesufu strongly believes that the lack of citizen engagement in the political process has given politicians the opportunity to engage in various forms of criminal activities. However, with an increasing number of citizens now actively participating in politics, Yesufu suggests that the balance of power is shifting.
Aisha Yesufu’s criticism serves as a call to action for Nigerian citizens to become more politically aware and involved, ensuring that their voices are heard and that the judiciary remains independent and free from external influences. As her statements gain traction and spark discussions, it remains to be seen how this will impact the ongoing discourse surrounding the intersection of politics, citizen engagement, and the judiciary in Nigeria.
Comments are closed.